Signup for our Newsletter

Signup for our newsletter and get news and updates about Real Estate investments and the Real Estate Market.
Name:
Email:

Tags

Recent Articles

Prices Fell .64 Percent in February, But Gained 1.43 Percent In Last Year

Apr 28, 2010 | No Comments | Sean Mills

I come across so much information in my research and as i have been so busy as of lately I have not posted much of anything.  I will just keep doing it regardless of the feedback.-Sean

Prices fell .64% in February, but increased 1.43% compared to a year earlier, according to new Case Shiller data, with [...]

I come across so much information in my research and as i have been so busy as of lately I have not posted much of anything.  I will just keep doing it regardless of the feedback.-Sean

Prices fell .64% in February, but increased 1.43% compared to a year earlier, according to new Case Shiller data, with the gain representing a significant positive change.

The Case Shiller 10-City Index would fall 7.68% over 12 months if the February fall continued, but the data on the direction of values point in many different directions. Prices for all of 2009 were flat, but have fallen 30% since values peaked in June 2006. The year-over-year increase is a new and positive pattern, but there are many negative trends to consider.

Most analysts for property values (and all assets including stocks) are naturally positive, which calls into question a positive zeitgeist now attached to property values. It is however unambiguously positive that both the 10-City and 20-City index registered a simultaneous annual gain in February — which was last seen in DECEMBER 2006 (more than THREE years ago).

Prices Fell .64 Percent in February, But Gained 1.43 Percent In Last Year

April 27, 2010

by Michael David White

Prices fell .64% in February, but increased 1.43% compared to a year earlier, according to new Case Shiller data, with the gain representing a significant positive change.

The Case Shiller 10-City Index would fall 7.68% over 12 months if the February fall continued, but the data on the direction of values point in many different directions. Prices for all of 2009 were flat, but have fallen 30% since values peaked in June 2006. The year-over-year increase is a new and positive pattern, but there are many negative trends to consider.

Most analysts for property values (and all assets including stocks) are naturally positive, which calls into question a positive zeitgeist now attached to property values. It is however unambiguously positive that both the 10-City and 20-City index registered a simultaneous annual gain in February — which was last seen in DECEMBER 2006 (more than THREE years ago).

Clouding any and every forecast on property values should be record delinquencies of 15% of all mortgages outstanding, unemployment at just under 10%, and a mortgage market of exceptionally high risk which has been abandoned by all private money sources. About 13.6 million homeowners have no equity or negative equity and therefore have no current wealth to protect by making their mortgage payment. Real estate prices would fall flat on their face without government mortgage money which represents nine of ten new mortgage dollars.

New Observations has previously forecast a fall in values in 2010 of 13 percent based on an average of four major property price indexes. In a separate analysis of a 120-year time series, we forecast a total fall still ahead in the national market of 22% and a total fall from peak-to-trend of 49 percent. Radical government intervention may stop these forecasted falls.

The Case Shiller monthly changes and annual changes for individual cities and for the composite indexes are listed above.

Check Calculated Risk for a good chart of rising and falling property prices and unemployment. Cool charts here on many of the cities covered by Case Shiller. Wall Street Journal on Case Shiller update.

***

PRINT — Prices fell .64% in February, but increased 1.43% compared to a year earlier

Please forward questions, corrections, and reactions to comments below or send me an email. Please send an email if you would like to take out a new mortgage.

Source Article

Bad bets: The condo meltdown in Las Vegas mirrors Miami’s

Dec 29, 2009 | No Comments | Sean Mills

Though Las Vegas’ problems are on a much smaller scale, the boom and bust is fairly similar. Some blame South Florida developers, in part, for whipping up the frenzy.

Photos

BY MONICA HATCHER

mhatcher@MiamiHerald.com

LAS VEGAS — With foreclosures soaring and home prices in the tank, Miami and Las Vegas often compete for the dubious distinction of being [...]

Though Las Vegas’ problems are on a much smaller scale, the boom and bust is fairly similar. Some blame South Florida developers, in part, for whipping up the frenzy.

BY MONICA HATCHER

mhatcher@MiamiHerald.com

LAS VEGAS — With foreclosures soaring and home prices in the tank, Miami and Las Vegas often compete for the dubious distinction of being the nation’s hardest hit condo market.

Just a few years ago the two cities shared a reputation as invincible boom towns. Now both real estate markets are climbing out of an abyss of stalled condo developments, spiraling foreclosures and stymied sales.

Trying to figure out which is the biggest real estate loser isn’t so easy. But comparing the two markets puts into perspective just how unprecedented Miami’s condo explosion was.

“They built less in Las Vegas than in Miami,” but there are fewer potential buyers, said Marty Burger, president and chief executive of Artisan Real Estate Ventures in Las Vegas.

Vegas condo owners like Kathy Riggle, a retiree from Tucson, who bought a condo conversion sight unseen for $180,000 during the boom, have watched in disbelief as values have dropped by more than half.

“Will Rogers once said, `Buy land because they ain’t making any more of it.’ We got caught up in it like a lot of people,” Riggle said.

Her unit, now valued at $49,000, is in foreclosure because she can no longer rent it for enough to cover the mortgage.

Las Vegas analysts and builders blame South Florida developers, as well as other out-of-market players, for helping whip up the condo mania in the nation’s gambling mecca.

During the the boom, Miami development companies launched full-scale assaults on the Vegas market — complete with cocktail parties (hosted by gorgeous models) and million-dollar sales centers.

The developers dreamed of expanding their empires on the new Vegas condo frontier.

They figured frequent visitors to Las Vegas from Canada and the mega-population hubs of Southern California would buy second homes rather than continue paying for high-priced hotel rooms.

Faulty assumption, said Richard Lee, a Las Vegas analyst and vice president with First American Title Company.

And here’s another false perception the Vegas condo boom was built on: Locals, tired of traffic and long commutes, would seek a more urban lifestyle closer to the action on the Vegas Strip.

“There was no real demand that you could point to,” said Jack Winston, a consultant with Goodkin Consulting who cautioned several South Florida developers about their ambitious Las Vegas plans. “The people in Las Vegas, if they want to gamble, they have their own casinos in the suburbs. Permanent residents rarely go down to the strip.”

Just as in South Florida — hemmed in by the Everglades and the ocean — the vertical push out West was propelled by the belief that developable land was running out. Although Las Vegas is surrounded by empty desert, much of it is federally owned and off limits to development.

“Outside developers came here and really misjudged this market,” said Irwin Molasky, a veteran Las Vegas real estate developer, who also built the 84-unit Park Place condominium that sold out in 2001. “It is not a Miami market. We don’t have the South American trade, the New York trade, and they just thought, if you build it, it will come.

“And, unfortunately, they turned out to be wrong.” he said.

Aventura-based Turnberry Associates was one of the first to go vertical in Las Vegas with the four-tower Turnberry Place project. It rapidly closed out 770 units and made tremendous profits.

Others tried to mimic them.

“It was like the gold rush after that,” said Bruce Weiner, president of Turnberry Ltd., the residential division of Turnberry Associates.

But condos weren’t the only buildings sprouting on the Vegas skyline. There was also a casino building spree that pushed construction and labor prices through the roof, forcing dozens of developers to shelve plans. In the end, a fraction of what had been proposed actually made it out of the ground.

PROJECTS STALLEDIn Las Vegas, only 8,300 condominiums of 29,000 residential condo units planned since 1999 were built, most of them around the Strip. Only 13 high-rise projects, comprising 21 towers, went up. Six were Turnberry’s.

 

Another 4,800 units are stalled in their tracks or otherwise yet to be completed, including almost 900 residential units in the vaunted CityCenter development, a $9 billion mixed-use project of shimmering hotels, condominiums and retail space that sits on 68 acres adjacent to the strip. The units are scheduled to begin closings in the first quarter of the new year.

As in South Florida, several developers were caught mid-construction when the market froze. Others, like Turnberry, which finished the two-tower Turnberry Towers in 2007, were stuck with unsold units.

“We were about 50 percent sold out in the second tower when Armageddon set in,” Weiner said. Turnberry’s partner in the venture, Prudential Real Estate Investors, ended up paying off the banks and taking ownership of the project, which still has about 250 of 636 units unsold, he said.

Another Turnberry project, the $3 billion Fountainebleau Las Vegas, with its 1,000 condo/hotel units, filed for bankruptcy in June.

PERFECT TIMINGJorge Perez of Miami’s Related Group, sensing an impending market implosion, pulled out at the last minute. He said his decision to cancel plans for a $3 billion mixed-use project called Las Ramblas was one of the smartest he ever made.

 

“The market was clearly showing signs of decline and the demand for construction services was so great that construction prices had been inflated to the point of making our project unfeasible,” Perez said in an e-mail. “Instead of taking the immense risk, I decided to sell the land at a huge profit.”

Perez also nixed ICON Las Vegas, a separate two-tower project in which three-quarters of the 502 units were pre-sold.

His timing was not as good with ICON Brickell, his $1 billion mega-condo in the 400 block of Miami’s Brickell Avenue. Although the project was completed in 2009, only about 100 sales in the 1,800-unit towers have closed. Perez has recently suggested that he may soon turn the project over to lenders in a “friendly foreclosure.”

Unlike the bulk of Miami’s new condominiums, which are clustered around the downtown area in stunning high-rise towers, most of the new Las Vegas projects are mid-rise buildings and condo/hotels perched on top of casino hotels.

In that sense, the problems plaguing the Las Vegas market have been less visible than the darkened condo towers of Miami and are obscured by massive LCD screens and the glitz of surrounding buildings.

Several real estate watchers estimated at least 1,000 Las Vegas units remain unsold, excluding apartments in CityCenter and other condo hotels. About 4,800 additional existing townhomes and condos also were for sale in November, according to the Greater Las Vegas Association of Realtors.

Since the condo model was relatively untested in Las Vegas, the volume of building was huge. But Miami’s building boom was far, far more expansive.

During the boom, developers had filed plans to build 85,000 new units throughout Miami-Dade County. The final count, according to Bal Harbor-based research firm Condo Vultures, has been about 23,000 units since 2003, more than double the amount built in the previous 40 years.

In the greater downtown area, where most new construction is located, developers still had almost 8,500 units to sell at the end of September. There are an additional 16,700 existing condo and town homes listed around Miami-Dade County as well.

Miami is burning off its excess supply of condos nearly twice as quickly as Las Vegas. The median price for an existing condo in Las Vegas stood at $72,500 in November and $149,000 in Miami-Dade.

Thousands of foreign investors, many from Latin America and with long-held ties to South Florida, have helped jump-start new condo sales. Although its just as hard to get a condo loan here as in Las Vegas, Las Vegas does not have hordes of foreign buyers willing to pay cash.

Also, lenders have begun allowing South Florida developers to sell units for less than the amount needed to repay their loans. That lowers prices for buyers.

Bulk buys, or the purchase of large blocks of condos for deep discounts by investors, have also taken off in Miami but not in Las Vegas.

“They haven’t gotten to the point of capitulation yet in Las Vegas,” said Peter Zalewski, a consultant with Condo Vultures. Burger, of Nevada-based Artisan Real Estate Ventures and also the leader of Related’s ICON Las Vegas project, said prices are all over the lot in Las Vegas — from more than $1,000 a square foot at CityCenter to $80 a square foot. Not even Miami, where new construction maxes out at about $500 per square foot, matches the lofty prices of CityCenter.

“There is a lot of cash out there ready to buy bulk, but they are ready to buy bulk at much cheaper price than developers and banks are willing to sell for right now,” Lee said.

Burger and partner John Tippins, a broker with NorthCap Commercial property, are among them. Caught in the stare-down, they decided to use their expertise in managing, selling and leasing Las Vegas condos still held by developers.

“We said, since we can’t buy the units at the moment, let’s keep our foot in the door,” Tippins said. “We think we can do a better job operating these buildings than some outside company.”

As for which market will mend more quickly, most analysts said it’s hard to tell.

For Weiner, so many unsold condos in South Florida will be tough to sell off.

But “as bad as it is,” he said, “I think South Florida will absorb its condos probably as fast, if not faster, than Las Vegas.”

Source Article

Las Vegs – More foreclosures on horizon, say analysts

Dec 17, 2009 | No Comments | Sean Mills

A cloud of foreclosures will hang over Las Vegas for at least a couple of more years and median prices will continue to fall in 2010, most likely by double digits, executives from two California-based real estate tracking firms said Tuesday.
About $2.5 trillion in adjustable-rate mortgages are due to reset from July through August 2011, [...]

A cloud of foreclosures will hang over Las Vegas for at least a couple of more years and median prices will continue to fall in 2010, most likely by double digits, executives from two California-based real estate tracking firms said Tuesday.

About $2.5 trillion in adjustable-rate mortgages are due to reset from July through August 2011, a substantial amount of it in places already reeling from the foreclosure crisis, said Rick Sharga, senior vice president of Irvine, Calif.-based RealtyTrac.

Read More » »

American Dream 2: Default, Then Rent

Dec 15, 2009 | No Comments | Sean Mills

PALMDALE, Calif. — Schoolteacher Shana Richey misses the playroom she decorated with Glamour Girl decals for her daughters. Fireman Jay Fernandez misses the custom putting green he installed in his backyard.
But ever since they quit paying their mortgages and walked away from their homes, they’ve discovered that giving up on the American dream has its [...]

PALMDALE, Calif. — Schoolteacher Shana Richey misses the playroom she decorated with Glamour Girl decals for her daughters. Fireman Jay Fernandez misses the custom putting green he installed in his backyard.

But ever since they quit paying their mortgages and walked away from their homes, they’ve discovered that giving up on the American dream has its benefits.

Both now live on the 3100 block of Club Rancho Drive in Palmdale, where a terrible housing market lets them rent luxurious homes — one with a pool for the kids, the other with a golf-course view — for a fraction of their former monthly payments.

Read More » »

Distressed Asset Update

Dec 7, 2009 | No Comments | Sean Mills

Two years ago, almost everyone was discussing, and looking forward to, a tsunami of distressed assets which would be coming to market based upon the sub-prime mortgage crisis and the stresses it would exert on the credit markets in general. In September of 2008, when Lehman failed and Wall Street as we knew it was [...]

Two years ago, almost everyone was discussing, and looking forward to, a tsunami of distressed assets which would be coming to market based upon the sub-prime mortgage crisis and the stresses it would exert on the credit markets in general. In September of 2008, when Lehman failed and Wall Street as we knew it was structurally transformed from an investment banking platform to one of bank holding companies, the “almost everyone” mentioned above was changed to “everyone”. But the tsunami has not arrived, not even close.

The fact that only a few distressed assets have been put in play is not because they aren’t out there. The pipeline is chock full of them.

Let’s use the New York City marketplace as an example. In the 2005-2007 period, there were $109 billion of investment sales in New York City. Based upon reductions in revenue (rent levels) across all product types including residential, office, retail and industrial and cap rate expansion, values have declined by 32%, on average, year to date. If we eliminate multifamily properties from this analysis, values have fallen from peak levels approximately 48%. Based upon these reductions, we estimate that, of the $109 billion spent on investment properties, $80 billion of that was spent on properties which now are in a negative equity position. This relates to about 6,000 properties.

If we include properties which were refinanced during the 2005-2007 period, the number of properties having negative equity jumps to 15,000. We estimate that there is about $165 billion in debt on these properties and, based upon today’s underwriting standards, there should only be about $65 billion in debt on them. This means that in order to have a conservatively leveraged marketplace, we would need to extract $100 billion in debt.

Clearly, this will not happen. Many investors have the ability to feed their properties and, based upon a desire to own them on a long-term basis, will do so. Other transactions will be worked out utilizing any of our favorite terms which have become commonplace in today’s vernacular including, “extend and pretend”, “delay and pray”, “a rolling loan gathers no loss” or “kicking the can down the road”. We do believe, however, that $30 to $40 billion will ultimately be extracted from the market in the form of losses.

So where are those distressed assets now? Some have not come to the market because they aren’t even in default yet due to mortgages which are still in interest only periods or are operating on an interest reserve set up by the lender when the loan was originated. Others have loans floating over 30-day LIBOR which closed on friday at 23 basis points (3-month LIBOR is only at 26 basis points). At 150 over LIBOR, the rate being paid on those loans would only be 1.73% and they can cash flow at those levels of debt service. While some properties are fundamentally under water, they are not yet in default, but likely will be when these advantageous terms expire.

Other distressed assets haven’t come to market because everything that has happened legislatively has allowed lenders to hide bad assets on their balance sheets. The FASB mark-to-market accounting rules have been modified to allow loss avoidance. Similarly, bank regulators will now allow lenders to hold a loan on their balance sheet at 100 even if they know that the underlying collateral for that loan is only worth 60. Additionally, modifications to the REMIC regulations have made it easier for CMBS loans to be kicked down the street.

Any of these delaying tactics will only be beneficial if appreciation is anticipated in the short-run. Given the massive deleveraging the market must experience and unemployment rates which are anticipated to remain elevated for at least another year to 18 months, we do not see support for the short-run appreciation argument.

We really don’t understand the reluctance of lenders to deal with these problem properties. Many of those that are in default are currently in the foreclosure process. This is a frustrating process, especially in New York, as it can take years to get through the process and obtain the title to the collateral. Many borrowers further complicate things by going into bankruptcy, which, based upon backlogs in the bankruptcy courts, adds additional time to the process.

It is very difficult to say this without sounding completely self-serving ( After all, I do sell buildings and notes for a living) but, if a lender wants out of a bad deal, selling a note today is likely to lead to a better recovery than waiting a year or two.

We believe this because the lack of product on the market toady has created a dynamic in which many investors are fighting over relatively few opportunities. Because of this, particularly on our income producing properties for sale, we are generally receiving 25 to 35 offers for each. Furthermore, on each note we have sold this year, we have received over 50 offers. This is due to the fact that buyers today would rather purchase from a lender than a private seller, believing they will get a better deal. “Believing” is the key word in the last sentence.

Due to the excessive demand for distressed assets, buyers are currently paying aggressive prices for anything banks are selling.  In many cases this year, we have obtained prices for notes that, we believe, are at or very near the value of the underlying collateral.

Some lenders are taking advantage of these dynamics to rid their balance sheets of underwater loans and are using the proceeds to make good loans today. Consider that two years ago, bank spreads, based upon all of the competition to put money out, were as low as 30 or 40 basis points. Those spreads can be 300-400 over corresponding treasuries today. Additionally, today’s loans have less risk associated with them as, rather than a loan to value ratio of 75%-85%, LTVs today are generally in the 60%-65% range. These loans are also significantly less on a price per square foot basis than they were two years ago.

If your business was 10 times as profitable as it used to be and there was much less risk involved, wouldn’t you be trying to do as much business as you could?

“Out with the bad, in with the good”, should be the mantra of lenders today. Until now, this has been slow to develop. To illustrate this, consider the following very telling statistics: Massey Knakal is asked by potential sellers to provide opinion of value reports and provide an explanation of our marketing program and we exclusively list about 31% of the properties that we are asked to analyze. It is just like a batting average in baseball, if we are hitting .300, we feel pretty good. With lenders and special servicers we are working with, we have completed just over 1,000 valuations and have exclusively listed just 12 properties/notes. That is a batting average of just .012. Many of these opportunities have simply not come to the market in any form. Perhaps the lender/servicer is waiting to see what the future will bring; perhaps they are simply making deals with the borrowers.

We have, however, seen this freeze thawing slightly as 2009 comes to a close. We expect to be coming to market with several distressed notes from lenders and special servicers right after the holidays and remain optimistic that we will be able to continue to achieve pricing at levels where the recovery versus collateral value is significant. There are also some foreclosures which should be concluding shortly which will lead to some REO which should be placed on the market shortly thereafter.

Let’s hope that 2010 sees a significant rise in these opportunities coming to market. It appears that the year will, at least, start out that way.

Mr. Knakal is the Chairman and Founding Partner of Massey Knakal Realty Services in New York City and has brokered the sale of over 1,000 properties in his career.


Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

Source Article www.globest.com

 

  • The Incline Village Foreclosure & Distressed Property Update
  • Mountain of modifications

    Oct 19, 2009 | No Comments | Sean Mills

    Mountain of modifications
    Industry tries to keep up with avalanche of troubled mortgages
    SAN DIEGO (MarketWatch) — Millions of homeowners are struggling to make their monthly mortgage payments and the continued deterioration in the job market guarantees millions more will be at risk in the coming months.
    That is putting a huge burden on mortgage-modification programs, both those [...]

    Mountain of modifications

    Industry tries to keep up with avalanche of troubled mortgages

    SAN DIEGO (MarketWatch) — Millions of homeowners are struggling to make their monthly mortgage payments and the continued deterioration in the job market guarantees millions more will be at risk in the coming months.

    That is putting a huge burden on mortgage-modification programs, both those run by the government and an increasing number operated by private industry, which are in a struggle of their own to stay ahead of the tide of potential foreclosures.

     

    A housing counselor helps a homeowner facing foreclosure assess payment options, at a Housing Rescue Fair in Dallas, Texas. (Reuters)

     

    “The subprime problem, by and large, has been dealt with,” said John Courson, chief executive of the Mortgage Bankers Association. “It’s a different kind of borrower now that we are trying to assist. And a lot of programs we have won’t work now. You can’t modify someone’s mortgage to 31% of income if they have no income.”

    A good portion of the MBA’s annual convention held here this week was devoted to loan-modification issues. And with good reason.

    As of Aug. 31, there were 3.3 million homeowners 60 days or more late on mortgage payments, said Faith Schwartz, who runs the Hope Now Alliance, a mortgage-industry trade group working on foreclosure prevention. A hotline for troubled homeowners run by the alliance fields 5,000 calls a day, she said, although that is only half of the number being handled earlier this year.

    “There’s a lot more competition out there,” Schwartz said. “Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have their own hotlines, and government and nonprofits. There is a lot hitting borrowers right now.”

    Read More » »

    Suburban Foreclosure Wave Threatens Economic Recovery

    Oct 15, 2009 | No Comments | Sean Mills

    To tell you the truth all is pretty quiet on the CRE end of real estate with a wait and see attitude of everyone holding their breath.  The squeaky wheel is residential right now and for at least a while.-Sean
    SUDBURY, Mass. — Jon Davis handles 10 percent of the state’s foreclosure auctions. The Marshfield lawyer [...]

    To tell you the truth all is pretty quiet on the CRE end of real estate with a wait and see attitude of everyone holding their breath.  The squeaky wheel is residential right now and for at least a while.-Sean

    SUDBURY, Mass. — Jon Davis handles 10 percent of the state’s foreclosure auctions. The Marshfield lawyer has been watching these auctions migrate from places such as Dorchester and Lowell.

    Now you’ll see them in the Sudburys, the Hinghams and the Westons,” Davis said, “where you wouldn’t have in the past expected to see foreclosures.”

    The reason for these auctions is not the crazy interest-rate mortgages. It’s the recession. Nowadays, people are losing their homes the way they used to before the sub-prime crisis.

    “Historically, people lost their home when they lost their job, they lost their health or they lost their spouse,” said Nick Retsinas, a housing market economist at Harvard University.

    Unemployment is to blame again today. The number of foreclosure proceedings in Massachusetts has jumped an alarming 150 percent.

    Read More » »

    Shiller: This Is No Housing Boom

    Oct 15, 2009 | No Comments | Sean Mills

    Our Southern California market is on a standstill in most things as they relate to real estate.  The upper end is feeling the pinch as they are get foreclosed on at an alarmingly high rate, er I should say the process is starting to gain steam as the “postponed” at the auctions are daily in [...]

    Our Southern California market is on a standstill in most things as they relate to real estate.  The upper end is feeling the pinch as they are get foreclosed on at an alarmingly high rate, er I should say the process is starting to gain steam as the “postponed” at the auctions are daily in the 90% plus rate.-Sean

    Yale professor Robert Shiller says the recent upturn in housing prices doesn’t signal that everything is now hunky dory for the home market.

    In fact, it’s just typical price volatility in an uncertain market, says the guru who called the massive housing crash years early.

    “The sudden rise in home prices suggests that the psychology of the market has shifted substantially,” Shiller wrote in The New York Times.

    “But what should we expect in the months ahead? Not necessarily that we’re entering a new housing boom.”

    The good news is that the S&P/Case-Shiller home price index for 10 major cities rose 3.6 percent between April and July.

    “While that is not a whopping increase, it followed a decline of 4.8 percent in the previous period, between January and April,” Shiller writes.

    Read More » »

    RealtyTrac: Foreclosure Activity Increases in Q3

    Oct 15, 2009 | No Comments | Sean Mills

    RealtyTrac® … today released its U.S. Foreclosure Market Report™ for Q3 2009, which shows that foreclosure filings — default notices, scheduled auctions and bank repossessions — were reported on 937,840 properties in the third quarter, a 5 percent increase from the previous quarter and an increase of nearly 23 percent from Q3 2008. One in [...]

    RealtyTrac® … today released its U.S. Foreclosure Market Report™ for Q3 2009, which shows that foreclosure filings — default notices, scheduled auctions and bank repossessions — were reported on 937,840 properties in the third quarter, a 5 percent increase from the previous quarter and an increase of nearly 23 percent from Q3 2008. One in every 136 U.S. housing units received a foreclosure filing during the quarter — the highest quarterly foreclosure rate since RealtyTrac began issuing its report in the first quarter of 2005.

    Foreclosure filings were reported on 343,638 properties in September, a 4 percent decrease from the previous month but a 29 percent increase from September 2008. Despite the monthly decrease, September’s total was still the third highest monthly total since the RealtyTrac report began in January 2005, behind only July and August of this year.

    “Bank repossessions, or REOs, jumped 21 percent from the second quarter to the third quarter, corresponding to jumps in defaults and scheduled auctions in the previous two quarters,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “REO activity increased from the previous quarter in all but two states and the District of Columbia, indicating that lenders may be starting to work through some of the pent-up foreclosure inventory caused by legislative delays, loan modification efforts and high volumes of distressed properties.”

    Read More » »

    The Banking System Is Insolvent

    Sep 30, 2009 | No Comments | Sean Mills

    A client told me the earlier this year “you’re such a bear, is there anything you like right now?” Those of you who know me can easily answer this question. As for this article from Market Ticker, it speaks for itself. It is nice to know I am not the only “Bear” [...]

    A client told me the earlier this year “you’re such a bear, is there anything you like right now?” Those of you who know me can easily answer this question. As for this article from Market Ticker, it speaks for itself. It is nice to know I am not the only “Bear” in the forest these days.-Sean

    Following up on the quick mention now that I have a story to cite from Amherst:

    Cure rates for these distressed loans remain low. Amherst noted a near 0% cure rate of all loans in foreclosure, 0.8% for 90 plus days delinquent, 4.4% for 60 days delinquent and 26.5% for 30-day delinquencies. All told, Amherst expects 12.42% of units (from the 13.54% of properties delinquent and in foreclosure) to eventually liquidate.

    Let’s put some numbers on this.

    There are roughly 125 million single-family homes in the US.

    Of those, roughly 30% have no mortgage on them at all. This leaves 87.5 million single-family homes with mortgages.

    Let us assume the average outstanding balance is $200,000 across the entire set and will take a 40% loss severity. This is less than S&P has estimated for subprime loans and only assumes a roughly 20% market deficiency in the home price (the rest is from legal, rehabilitation and marketing expenses.)

    These numbers are, with a high degree of confidence (90%+) low – that is, losses will exceed these estimates, perhaps dramatically so. It is, for example, quite reasonable to believe that due to the concentration of defaults in higher-priced areas (e.g. California and Florida) that the average outstanding balance could be close to double that $200,000 value and the loss due to negative equity higher.

    From this we can develop a “cocktail napkin” view of the losses to be taken in home mortgages for single-family homes (remember, this does not include condos, apartment buildings and similar “commercial” paper.)

    $200,000 X 40% = $80,000 loss per foreclosure.

    87.5 million homes with mortgages X 12.42% = 10,867,500 foreclosures.

    10,867,500
    x 80,000
    =============
    $869,400,000,000

    or $869 billion in losses remaining in single-family mortgages alone.

    What if the average outstanding is higher and negative equity greater than 20% (which is likely)? Losses will almost certainly be well north of a trillion dollars.

    The entire banking system and likely The Fed, given the quantity of Fannie and Freddie paper it has been and is “eating”, is insolvent. These facts are why the government is lying – they’re well-aware of the near-zero cure rates and know that these facts mean that the banking industry has nowhere near sufficient capital to withstand these losses without folding like a paper cup getting stomped on by an elephant.

    (Remember that these numbers do not include any commercial real estate losses and we have found that banks are frequently over-stating their claimed values for these loans by 50% or more – as was seen with Colonial.)

    It gets better. The FDIC has a negative balance both in its fund balance and the reserve ratio projected for the end of the quarter, which is, big surprise, tomorrow. Oh, and there is this pesky problem that the FDIC has – contrary to its mandate – been issuing bond guarantees for banks, so if and when that banking insolvency is recognized the FDIC will implode into a gravity well also, since it is on the hook for the entire deficiency of those bonds that were issued with its “guarantee” should they default.

    Care to argue with the math folks?

    « Older Entries