Signup for our Newsletter

Signup for our newsletter and get news and updates about Real Estate investments and the Real Estate Market.
Name:
Email:

Tags

Recent Articles

Freddie Mac: 30 Year Mortgages Rates fall to series record low

Aug 12, 2010 | No Comments

After sitting on the sidelines for the past years with regards to homeownership I decided to take the plunge again.  Interest rates are as low as anyone can remember seeing in the past 50 plus years.  Homes, in certain areas, are selling for 30 to 50 cents on the dollar as opposed to the market highs on the past 5 years.  Fannie, Freddie and even HUD have record levels of inventory of SFRs sitting on their books.  As all the media coverage has highlighted we are not dashing forward on the recovery the way the federal government had hoped.  Stocks fell several hundred points yesterday due to the coverage of these statements from the Fed chairman Mr. Ben Bernake.  Sit back put your feet up people we are going to be here for a while.  A jobless recovery with massive federal government incentives is not the answer.  You can’t eat healthcare and you can’t tuck your kids in at night to this poorly crafted cleverly cloaked insurance company bailout.  Sure this is a rant but what the hell I have been gone a while, enjoy the read and beware I am back posting.-Sean

Freddie Mac said Thursday the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage average fell to record low of 4.44% with an average 0.7 point for the week ending Aug. 12. In the previous period, the average was 4.49% …

This calls for a long term graph …

30 year mortgage rates Click on graph for larger image in new window.

This graph shows the 30 year fixed rate mortgage interest rate based on the Freddie Mac survey since 1971.

The decline in mortgage rates is related to the weak economy and falling Treasury yields. Rates will probably fall again this week with the Ten Year Treasury yield down to 2.7%.

Note: this series only goes back to 1971. Mortgage rates were at or below 5% back in the 1950s.

Source Article

Home Tax Credit a Costly Failure

Apr 28, 2010 | No Comments

From David Kocieniewski at the NY Times: Home Tax Credit Called Successful, but Costly

Though the Treasury Department and the real estate industry have termed the program a success, helping 1.8 million people buy homes, many tax policy experts say it has been singularly cost-ineffective: most of the $12.6 billion in credits through end of February was collected by people who would have bought homes anyway or who in some cases were not even eligible.

There is no question this program was very costly. And why is the Treasury confusing activity with accomplishment? Sure sales briefly surged, but were new households formed? How many new jobs were created?

“We were happy in our apartment, but $8,000 was just too much to pass up,” said [Mr. James Green, a student at Purdue University], 29, who shopped furiously with his wife for two months before signing a contract in March to buy a three-bedroom ranch.

“We bid on a couple places that didn’t work out,” he said, “but we always made sure we had a backup plan because we didn’t want to miss the deadline for the credit. And when we finally agreed to a contract, it was this huge relief.”

For every home buyer like the Greens, real estate agents say there are at least three others who collected the credit even though they would have bought without it. That means for each new buyer who was truly lured into the market by the credit, the federal government paid more than $30,000.

This is very optimistic – the ratio was probably 5-to-1 for the initial credit and even higher for the extension. But this shows two failures of the tax credit: 1) the high cost, and 2) it was just moving people from apartments to homes and didn’t reduce the excess housing inventory (yes, rentals count as housing inventory too).

“The tax credit helped to stanch the price declines, which had substantial benefit for the entire economy,” said Mark Zandi at Moody’s Economy.com.

And this has been the policy – support asset prices by limiting the supply (all the foreclosure delays), and pushing demand (low mortgage rates and the tax credit). This has helped the banks significantly, and Zandi argues this has boosted confidence. Maybe … but I’m not convinced that supporting house prices above the market clearing level to help the banks and boost consumer confidence makes sense. I think targeting jobs – and therefore household formation – would have been a far more cost effective program.

Source Article

Prices Fell .64 Percent in February, But Gained 1.43 Percent In Last Year

Apr 28, 2010 | No Comments

I come across so much information in my research and as i have been so busy as of lately I have not posted much of anything.  I will just keep doing it regardless of the feedback.-Sean

Prices fell .64% in February, but increased 1.43% compared to a year earlier, according to new Case Shiller data, with the gain representing a significant positive change.

The Case Shiller 10-City Index would fall 7.68% over 12 months if the February fall continued, but the data on the direction of values point in many different directions. Prices for all of 2009 were flat, but have fallen 30% since values peaked in June 2006. The year-over-year increase is a new and positive pattern, but there are many negative trends to consider.

Most analysts for property values (and all assets including stocks) are naturally positive, which calls into question a positive zeitgeist now attached to property values. It is however unambiguously positive that both the 10-City and 20-City index registered a simultaneous annual gain in February — which was last seen in DECEMBER 2006 (more than THREE years ago).

Prices Fell .64 Percent in February, But Gained 1.43 Percent In Last Year

April 27, 2010

by Michael David White

Prices fell .64% in February, but increased 1.43% compared to a year earlier, according to new Case Shiller data, with the gain representing a significant positive change.

The Case Shiller 10-City Index would fall 7.68% over 12 months if the February fall continued, but the data on the direction of values point in many different directions. Prices for all of 2009 were flat, but have fallen 30% since values peaked in June 2006. The year-over-year increase is a new and positive pattern, but there are many negative trends to consider.

Most analysts for property values (and all assets including stocks) are naturally positive, which calls into question a positive zeitgeist now attached to property values. It is however unambiguously positive that both the 10-City and 20-City index registered a simultaneous annual gain in February — which was last seen in DECEMBER 2006 (more than THREE years ago).

Clouding any and every forecast on property values should be record delinquencies of 15% of all mortgages outstanding, unemployment at just under 10%, and a mortgage market of exceptionally high risk which has been abandoned by all private money sources. About 13.6 million homeowners have no equity or negative equity and therefore have no current wealth to protect by making their mortgage payment. Real estate prices would fall flat on their face without government mortgage money which represents nine of ten new mortgage dollars.

New Observations has previously forecast a fall in values in 2010 of 13 percent based on an average of four major property price indexes. In a separate analysis of a 120-year time series, we forecast a total fall still ahead in the national market of 22% and a total fall from peak-to-trend of 49 percent. Radical government intervention may stop these forecasted falls.

The Case Shiller monthly changes and annual changes for individual cities and for the composite indexes are listed above.

Check Calculated Risk for a good chart of rising and falling property prices and unemployment. Cool charts here on many of the cities covered by Case Shiller. Wall Street Journal on Case Shiller update.

***

PRINT — Prices fell .64% in February, but increased 1.43% compared to a year earlier

Please forward questions, corrections, and reactions to comments below or send me an email. Please send an email if you would like to take out a new mortgage.

Source Article

CoreLogic: 24% of residential properties upside down

Feb 24, 2010 | No Comments

From FirstAmerican Core Logic:

…more than 11.3 million, or 24 percent, of all residential properties with mortgages were in negative equity at the end of the fourth quarter of 2009, up from 10.7 million and 23 percent at the end of the third quarter of 2009. An additional 2.3 million mortgages were approaching negative equity at the end of last year, meaning they had less than five percent equity. Together, negative equity and near-negative equity mortgages accounted for nearly 29 percent of all residential properties with a mortgage nationwide.

Negative equity means the mortgage balance is higher than the value of the home.

The bulk of underwater properties are concentrated in five states: California, Florida, Nevada, Arizona and Michigan. Nevada leads the way in terms of most homes with negative equity at a whopping 70 percent.

“Home-ownership” is badly defined by, for instance, the Census Bureau, which considers all “owner-occupied housing units” in its calculation of the home-ownership rate.

But the rate would be far lower if one simply calculated the amount of equity that Americans have in their homes. Since this is the portion of real estate for which they don’t pay anything, it is the only portion that is truly “owned.”

Subtract folks who owe more on their homes than they are worth and the home-ownership rate drops from 67% to 43%.

Update: Reader Dan Hess offers a better calculation in the comments. He correctly notes that underwater homes are 24% of homes with mortgages, not 24% of all homes as I implied in the math above. Backing out these homes would reduce the homeownership rate to 57%. Though backing out ALL mortgage debt, even on homes with owner equity, would lower the ownership rate even more.

This isn’t merely academic. Having equity in their homes is a big reason homeowners keep paying their mortgage, which is necessary for banks to stay solvent.

Source Article

Freddie Mac: “Potential Large Wave of Foreclosures”

Feb 24, 2010 | No Comments

Another fine calculated risk article.-Sean

“We start 2010 with some early signs of stabilization in the housing market, with house prices and home sales likely nearing the bottom sometime in 2010. We expect that low mortgage rates, relatively high affordability and the homebuyer tax credit will help continue to fuel the recovery. Still, the housing recovery remains fragile, with significant downside risk posed by high unemployment and a potential large wave of foreclosures.”
Freddie Mac Chief Executive Officer Charles E. Haldeman, Jr.

The quote is from the Freddie Mac Q4 earnings release:

Read More » »

Housing: The Best Leading Indicator for the Economy

Feb 24, 2010 | No Comments

Of course this is contrary to what the National Association of Realtors is saying, but you make the decision.-Sean

Historically the best leading indicator for the economy (and employment) has been housing. I’ve been writing about this for years. For a great summary paper, see Professor Leamer’s presentation from the 2007 Jackson Hole Symposium: Housing and the Business Cycle

For housing as a leading indicator, I use Residential Investment (quarterly from the BEA’s GDP report), and monthly data on Housing Starts and New Home sales from the Census Bureau, and builder confidence from the NAHB.

Read More » »

California Housing Losses by County and City

Feb 11, 2010 | No Comments

I came across this on Patrick.net and could not pass it up. -Sean

California Housing Losses By County and City

Read More » »

Foreclosure picture bleak, unemployment wreaking havok

Jan 19, 2010 | No Comments

Does this surprise anyone?  Do you need to be a rocket scientist to figure this out?  I guess you do with all the mis-information floating around. -Sean

A record 3 million U.S. homes will be repossessed by lenders this year as high unemployment and depressed home values leave borrowers unable to make their house payment or sell, according to a RealtyTrac Inc. forecast.

Last year there were 2.82 million foreclosures, the most since RealtyTrac began compiling data in 2005. More than 4.5 million filings are expected this year, including default or auction notices and bank seizures, said Rick Sharga, senior vice president for the seller of default data and forecasts based in Irvine, Calif. There were 3.96 million filings in 2009.

“This will be the peak year, and the main reasons are unemployment and house prices that have stabilized way below mortgage amounts,” Kenneth Rosen, chairman of the University of California’s Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics in Berkeley, said in an interview.

Government and lender efforts to keep people in their homes are failing to relieve the worst foreclosure crisis since the Great Depression. Unemployment was 10 percent in December, unchanged from the previous month, while the so-called underemployment rate that includes part-time workers and discouraged workers rose to 17.3 percent from 17.2 percent, the Labor Department said Jan. 8.

U.S. lenders permanently modified 31,382 mortgages, or 1 percent, of the 4 million loans targeted under the Obama administration’s foreclosure prevention plan through November, the U.S. Treasury Department said last month. Fewer than half of the 3.2 million homeowners estimated as eligible for mortgage relief by the Treasury actually qualify, according to Herb Allison, assistant secretary for financial stability.

“The government doesn’t have their act together on housing,” Rosen said. “They seem to be pussy-footing around. We need a much more robust effort.”

Obama’s loan-modification program is “destined to fail” because it doesn’t confront the problem of negative equity that is driving foreclosures, Laurie Goodman, senior managing director at Amherst Securities Group LP, told Congress Dec. 8. Homeowners with negative equity, where a property is worth less than the loan, have little incentive to keep paying the mortgage and will “strategically default,” Rosen said.

More than 728,000 borrowers have already received an average $550 reduction in monthly payments, giving them “a second chance to stay in their homes,” she said.

An $8,000 first-time homebuyer tax credit and a $200 billion lifeline to keep mortgage buyers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac solvent are among the administration’s efforts to date that have supported the housing market, she said.

“Modifications will not be the solution for all homeowners and will not solve the housing crisis alone,” Reilly said.

The number of homeowners with negative equity totaled 10.7 million, or 23 percent, at the end of the third quarter, according to a Nov. 24 report by First American CoreLogic, a Santa Ana, Calif.-based real estate research firm.

Home prices probably fell 13 percent in 2009 to a median of $172,700, following a drop of 9.5 percent the previous year, Walt Molony, a spokesman for the National Association of Realtors, said in an interview. Prices are down 26 percent from the July 2006 peak.

Defaults among prime borrowers are likely to accelerate, adding to a “huge” inventory of properties that banks possess and haven’t yet put on the market, according to Robert Shiller and Karl Case, who created the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index. In September, Goodman estimated that 7 million homes were already in foreclosure or likely to be seized.

The housing market is weighed down by a “a massive supply of delinquent loans” that will end up in foreclosure this year, James Saccacio, RealtyTrac’s chief executive officer, said in a statement Friday.

The end of the government’s tax credit for first-time buyers, scheduled to expire in the spring, and the end of the Federal Reserve’s $1.25 trillion purchase of mortgage bonds, may add to housing woes, Rosen said.

A total of 2,824,674 U.S. properties got at least one foreclosure filing in 2009, a 21 percent jump from the prior year and more than double the number in 2007, RealtyTrac said.

About 2.2 percent of households received a filing last year, according to the company, which sells default data collected from more than 2,200 counties representing 90 percent of the U.S. population.

December filings increased 15 percent from a year earlier to 349,519, the 10th straight month the tally surpassed 300,000. Foreclosures in the fourth quarter jumped 18 percent from the same period in 2008 and fell 7 percent from the third quarter.

Nevada had the highest foreclosure rate for the third straight year in 2009, with more than 10 percent of households receiving at least one filing. December filings fell 22 percent from a year earlier and rose 27 percent from November.

Arizona had the second-highest rate for the year as more than 6 percent of households got a filing. Florida was third at 5.93 percent, followed by California at 4.75 percent and Utah at 2.93 percent, RealtyTrac said.

The other states among the 10 highest rates were Idaho at 2.72 percent, Georgia at 2.68 percent, Michigan at 2.61 percent, Illinois at 2.5 percent and Colorado at 2.37 percent.

source article

Bank of America to release homes

Jan 19, 2010 | No Comments

Bank of America expects to release about 6,000 foreclosed properties into the Nevada housing market in 2010, or about 500 a month, an executive with the bank said Wednesday.

It’s part of the so-called “phantom inventory” of foreclosed homes being held by banks as they work out loan modifications and negotiate short sales, two of the more desirable alternatives to foreclosure.

Throughout the country, estimates of homes being taken back by Bank of America range from 11,000 to 14,000 a month in the early part of this year to 29,000 to 35,000 by November and December, said John Ciresi, vice president and portfolio manager for Bank of America in Towson, Md.

The system became “clogged” by a voluntary moratorium on foreclosures while banks met the requirements of President Obama’s Making Home Affordable mortgage plan program and by state legislation requiring mediation before banks can start the foreclosure process, Ciresi said at a panel discussion sponsored by the Nevada chapter of the National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals.

Some homes are being held back from closing escrow because of Bank of America’s fiduciary relationship with investors, he said.

“Let’s say you have a $120,000 property and you have a $110,000 offer from a cash buyer and a $120,000 offer on a VA loan,” Ciresi said. “Do I take the higher offer and hope financing is approved?”

Adam Fenn, president of Merit Asset Services in Henderson, said there’s talk on Wall Street about a “double-dip recession,” even as some data point to economic recovery. People are frustrated in their efforts to buy a home and there’s not enough capital out there to finance purchases, he said.

“It’s kind of scary,” Fenn said. “When you go for the highest and best offer, you get people bidding too high and the property ends up going back on the market. I think there’s going to be a double-dip in values. They’re going to go up and then come back down.”

Ciresi anticipates a rise in the foreclosure rate in 2010 because 60 percent of loan modifications failed and went into foreclosure. It’s a combination of property devaluation and people losing their jobs, he said.

Bank of America is getting 40,000 new offers a month on short sales, or homes offered for less than the mortgage balance, Ciresi said. It’s a difficult process, he said.

“Try to understand, we don’t have the title in a short sale. That makes it very difficult in a short sale versus an REO (real estate-owned) home,” he said.

Some banks are getting short sales done in as little as 30 days, said Steve Hawks, director of the National Association of Short Sale Professionals. They’re doing “cash for cooperation” deals, giving people $5,000 to leave the home in good condition.

“The average right now is four to six months, but I see an average of 90 days in 2010, except for a few institutions that have to answer to different investors,” Hawks said. “With half the country underwater (owing more than their home is worth), they’re going to make it easier for a short sale.”

He said 22 percent of mortgage defaults were “strategic defaults,” coming on homes that were underwater. Banks need to eliminate the hardship letter for short sales and consider anyone who falls behind on their payment, Hawks said.

ReMax Pros Realtor Tim Kelly Kiernan said the REO inventory in Las Vegas is dwindling, even though 200 homes a day are going into default.

“Where are these homes? Banks are trying to convert some of them to short sales, but they’re holding on to houses in lieu of the market stabilizing and it has,” Kiernan said. “But every trend says there’s a second tsunami coming. These houses are somewhere. They’re not disappearing.”

source article reviewjournal.com

Short Sale ‘Fraud’, SoCal Home Sales, FHA to Tighten Standards

Jan 19, 2010 | No Comments

Well I have been off looking at investments again and so I have been neglecting my duties here at Real Estate Smart Talk.  I will try to be better in the future.  One prediction for the future we will not see significant levels of REO sales it appears the banks are diligent working on the loan mods for all the distressed owners but instead short sales will rule the next cycle.  Let me know what you think.  -Sean

A few articles of interest …

  • From Diana Olick at CNBC: Short Sale ‘Fraud’ Follow. This is a followup to her earlier article: Big Banks Accused of Short Sale FraudThis alleged activity by banks – paying 2nd lien holders without proper disclosure – appears outrageous. Based on Olick’s reporting, this practice appears to be widespread. Kudos to Olick and hopefully the regulators are reading.
  • From DataQuick: Southland home sales, median price up over last year. As DataQuick notes the median price increase was due to a change in mix – as always I recommend ignoring the median price.

    Southern California home sales in December remained above year-ago levels for the 18th consecutive month, bolstered by gains in many mid- to high-end communities. \

    The December sales tally was the highest for that month since 24,209 homes sold in December 2006, but it was still 11.2 percent below the average for a December – 25,143 sales – over the past 22 years.

    December’s foreclosure resales remained well below peak levels but were still a large force in the market, edging higher than the prior month for the first time since last February. Foreclosure resales – houses and condos sold in December that had been foreclosed on in the prior 12 months – were 39.6 percent of resales, up from 39.0 percent in November but down from 53.5 percent in December 2008. They hit a high of 56.7 percent last February, then tapered or leveled off month-to-month until last month’s uptick.

    Government-insured FHA loans, a popular choice among first-time buyers, accounted for 39.6 percent of all home purchase mortgages in December.

    Absentee buyers – mostly investors and some second-home purchasers – bought 19.2 percent of the homes sold in December. Buyers who appeared to have paid all cash – meaning there was no indication that a corresponding purchase loan was recorded – accounted for 24.9 percent of December sales, based on an analysis of public records.

    The market is still mostly first time homebuyers and investors.

    And the high percentage of FHA buyers is a good lead into the third story …

  • From Nick Timiraos at the WSJ: Souring Mortgages, Weak Market Force FHA to Walk a Tightrope
  • Source Article Calculated Risk

    Souring FHA-insured mortgages are threatening the agency’s finances. Congress is pressuring [FHA commissioner, Mr. Stevens] to tighten the easy-money standards that once helped people like him, and he is expected to announce revisions as early as this week.

    « Older Entries